CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZING BENCHMARKS.
At $1M to $5M, curtain wall and glazing contractors average 27% gross margin and spend 18% of revenue on overhead, which leaves 9% net profit before taxes (Run On CFOS Trade Benchmark Reference). The CFOS target is 12% net before taxes, the figure the book CONTROL sets for every trade and every revenue band. Getting there means overhead at 17% and gross margin at 29%, and the distance is almost always overhead that was never loaded into the bid.
CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZING FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS. WHERE YOU SHOULD BE.
| METRIC | INDUSTRY AVERAGE | CFOS TARGET | AT $10M TO $25M | NOTES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin ($1M to $5M) | 27% | 29% | 29% | Industry figure is 28% at $5M to $10M and 29% at $10M to $25M. |
| Overhead Rate ($1M to $5M) | 18% | 17% | 16% | Falls to 16% by $10M to $25M as fixed cost spreads over more revenue. |
| Net Profit Margin ($1M to $5M) | 9% | 12% | 13% | Industry figure is 11% at $5M to $10M and 13% at $10M to $25M. |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 90 days | 45 days | 30 days | Ninety days is weak, 45 is the target, 30 is strong. Nothing else moves cash faster. |
Showing $1M to $25M. The full data set for every revenue band is on Run On CFOS.
Industry figures are the AVERAGE for the trade at each revenue band, from the Run On CFOS Trade Benchmark Reference, not a floor. Net profit is stated before taxes. The CFOS target is what we build toward. The third column is what companies at $10M to $25M average, shown for direction of travel; that is a larger company, which is a different thing from a better managed one.
Below the curtain wall and glazing average on margins? Bring your last P&L to a 20 minute call. Josh will tell you where the gap is and what closes it.
Compare my numbers on a callTHE CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZING GAP CALCULATOR. WHAT IT COSTS YOU A YEAR.
Put in your last 12 months. The calculator picks your revenue band and sets your net profit beside the curtain wall and glazing average and the CFOS target, in dollars. Nothing you type leaves this page.
Your results show here once all three numbers are in.
Want it done from your books instead? The Financial Health Snapshot builds a CEO Report from your last 12 months and sets every figure against your trade, or compare your numbers with Josh on a 20 minute call.
CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZING GROSS MARGIN.
How to calculate: Gross margin is Revenue minus Direct Job Costs, divided by Revenue, times 100. Direct job costs include labour, materials, equipment and subcontracted work tied to the job. Not shop overhead, office staff or G and A.
Glazing already earns 27 percent gross, among the strongest in this dataset, so the two points to a 29 percent target are worth $20,000 on a $1M year and $100,000 on a $5M year. The two points are in field conditions. The frames are square and the building isn't, so out-of-tolerance rough openings, out-of-square slab edges, and wider caulk joints all add field labor the base bid never priced. A schedule of additional costs written into the bid turns the building's imperfections into a change order instead of absorbed labor, and that's a documentation habit rather than a price.
GROSS MARGIN BY REVENUE BAND, $1M TO $25M
| REVENUE BAND | INDUSTRY AVERAGE | CFOS TARGET |
|---|---|---|
| $1M to $5M | 27% | 29% |
| $5M to $10M | 28% | 28% |
| $10M to $25M | 29% | 27% |
CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZING OVERHEAD RATE.
How to calculate your overhead rate: Total overhead divided by Total Revenue, times 100. Overhead is every cost not attributable to a job: office staff, rent, insurance, software, vehicles not charged to work, and owner salary. It moves every month with revenue, which is why a rate set a year ago is wrong in both directions.
Glazing has an 18 percent overhead rate, among the heaviest in this dataset, and the point down to 17 is worth $10,000 on a $1M year and $50,000 on a $5M year. Glazing has an engineering department: shop drawings, structural calculations, and product approval regimes like Florida Product Approval and Miami-Dade acceptance all consume salaried hours billed to nobody. Warranty exposure on air and water performance has a long tail behind that, and leak callbacks come out of the same bucket years later. Charging the submittal phase to the project it belongs to is the move, and the trade should reach 15 percent by $25M to $50M.
See the full benchmarks for every revenue band on Run On CFOS.
OVERHEAD RATE BY REVENUE BAND, $1M TO $25M
| REVENUE BAND | INDUSTRY AVERAGE | CFOS TARGET |
|---|---|---|
| $1M to $5M | 18% | 17% |
| $5M to $10M | 17% | 16% |
| $10M to $25M | 16% | 15% |
CURTAIN WALL AND GLAZING NET PROFIT MARGIN.
Net profit margin formula: Net Profit divided by Total Revenue, times 100. Unlike gross margin this measures what is left after overhead and G and A. It's the number that funds owner draw, debt paydown and growth.
Glazing starts from 9 percent net before taxes, one of the higher floors in this dataset, and the three points to a 12 percent target are $30,000 on a $1M year and $150,000 on a $5M year. What holds the rest is a schedule nobody can accelerate. Curtain wall components have some of the longest lead times of any building material, installation can't resequence around missing units the way a finish trade can, and one late truck idles the entire crew while every other trade keeps billing. Idle-crew cost tracked daily and late deliveries documented in writing are the difference between a claim and a loss, and neither one requires a bid increase.
NET PROFIT MARGIN BY REVENUE BAND, $1M TO $25M
| REVENUE BAND | INDUSTRY AVERAGE | CFOS TARGET |
|---|---|---|
| $1M to $5M | 9% | 12% |
| $5M to $10M | 11% | 12% |
| $10M to $25M | 13% | 12% |
Benchmarks for subcontractors from $1M to $25M. This is a partial view of the Run On CFOS benchmark reference, which covers every band up to $500M and above. The full Run On CFOS benchmark reference is on runoncfos.com.
Gross margin and overhead come from figures CFMA, Jones Maresca and other sources publish by trade and size. Net profit is computed, not surveyed: net profit = gross margin minus overhead. Nothing comes out for taxes, interest or other income and expense, so it is a before tax figure, on the same basis as CFMA's net income before taxes.
CFMA's 2025 medians are 7.1 percent before interest and taxes and 6.7 percent net income before taxes. Gross margin minus overhead leaves out interest and other income and expense, so a figure here can come in a little above or below a reported net income on the same business. The bands above the $10M to $25M band are published at runoncfos.com as a modeled extension of the same curves. They have not been reconciled against the licensed CFMA Benchmarker, so read them as a model and not as a survey result.
Trade figures are from the Run On CFOS Trade Benchmark Reference, published by Sulphur Prairie Operations, LLC. Net profit is stated before taxes. CFMA reports net income before taxes too, so the two read on the same basis. Re-validate against CFMA reporting on the normal quarterly cycle, per the benchmark reference's own instruction.
The reference itself is published at curtain wall and glazing in the open reference. How the figures were sourced and how net profit is derived is set out at runoncfos.com.
Cite as: Run On CFOS. Run On CFOS Trade Benchmark Reference: Curtain Wall and Glazing. 2026. Sulphur Prairie Operations, LLC. https://runoncfos.com/trades/glazing. CC BY 4.0.
- 2024 Construction Financial Benchmarker, Executive Summary, Construction Financial Management Association, 2024. 21.8% gross profit margin, 11.8% SG&A and 6.3% net income before taxes across all respondents, with a best-in-class top quartile at 11.9% net income before taxes.
- 2025 Construction Financial Benchmarker, Construction Financial Management Association, 2025. 6.7% net income before taxes (6.3% in 2023), a 7.1% EBIT margin and an 8.8% EBITDA margin at the median, with interest coverage of 30.4 times, across the 1,558 companies in the 2025 analysis (fiscal year 2024 results).
- 2025 Performance Benchmarks, Construction Companies, Jones Maresca and Company, 2025. Specialty contractor gross margin of 15% to 25%, net profit of 5% to 8% for a well managed company, and total indirect cost of 8% to 15%.
Each metric across every trade is published on Gross Margin by Trade, Overhead Rates by Trade and Net Profit by Trade, and the full dataset for all 48 trades across the published revenue bands is available as JSON and CSV, with one plain-language statement per row. Free to use with attribution.
FLAT MONTHLY FEE. NO SURPRISES.
Priced by trailing 12 month revenue. No hourly billing. No payroll. The one-time onboarding fee is right here in the table.
Built for subs doing $1M to $12M. Above $12.5M we quote.
| Last 12 months revenue | Core | Strategic | Platinum | One-time onboarding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under $1M | $1,900 | $3,100 | $3,300 | $1,000 |
| $1M to $3.5M | $2,600 | $4,100 | $5,300 | $1,500 |
| $3.5M to $6.5M | $3,800 | $5,900 | $8,300 | $3,000 |
| $6.5M to $9.5M | $5,100 | $7,600 | $11,800 | $4,500 |
| $9.5M to $12.5M | $6,100 | $8,900 | $14,900 | $6,000 |
| Above $12.5M | Quoted | Quoted | Quoted | Quoted |
The onboarding fee covers migrating your books back to the start of your last taxable year and getting you fully operational in 60 days. It's billed once, with your first invoice. It's the same for all three tiers, and it moves with your revenue band. Your first month is prorated, and your monthly engagement starts on the first of the first full month.
The three tier columns are the whole price. Which one fits depends on how much of the work you want off your desk. No payroll. No hidden line items. The onboarding fee is right here in the table.
- Online software only: QuickBooks, Sage, Viewpoint and similar. No VPN or hosted desktop.
- Not in any tier: payroll, pay applications, collections on receivables.
- Pricing valid through 2027.
What Core, Strategic and Platinum each include is on the pricing page.
FREQUENTLY ASKED.
