WHAT CFOS REPLACES
IN CONSTRUCTION.
Most construction subcontractors already have a bookkeeper, a CPA, and a spreadsheet. They still don't know if they're making money on individual jobs. They still get surprised at the end of the year. They still make decisions based on bank balance instead of actual financial position. CFOS replaces the setup that produces those outcomes — not by adding a new layer on top of it, but by replacing the structure entirely.
WHAT MOST SUBCONTRACTORS
CURRENTLY HAVE.
Before CFOS, the typical financial setup for a $3M–$8M subcontractor looks like this. Each piece does something. None of them talk to each other. And the owner ends up doing the interpretation work that none of them are positioned to do.
WHAT CHANGES WHEN
CFOS IS IN PLACE.
WHAT CFOS PRODUCES
IN PRACTICE.
The concrete sub doing $4.9M: had a bookkeeper, filed taxes on time, and tracked jobs in a spreadsheet. Netted $161K on $4.9M of revenue — 3.3%. After CFOS identified the overhead rate problem and rebuilt the bid structure, net profit went to $1.1M on $5.2M of revenue the following year. The work didn't change. The financial system did. Read the case study →
| Revenue | Core Financial | Executive Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Under $1M | $1,900/mo | $2,900/mo |
| $1M–$3M | $2,600/mo | $3,600/mo |
| $4M–$6M | $3,800/mo | $5,500/mo |
| $7M–$9M | $5,100/mo | $6,900/mo |
| $10M–$12M | $6,100/mo | $8,500/mo |
| $13M+ | Quoted | Quoted |
Core Financial: ControlQore setup, job costing, bookkeeping, bank recs. Executive Financial: everything in Core plus monthly CFO advisory, controllership, and accountability. Full breakdown →