WHY STRUCTURAL STEEL CONTRACTORS LOSE MARGIN WITHOUT KNOWING IT.
Structural Steel margin is lost to three specific things: the paper gate, the idle crane, and the ton tape. Structural Steel subcontractors at $1M to $5M run 23 percent gross and 6.5 percent net, against CFOS targets at $1M to $5M of 25.5 percent gross and 11.5 percent net. All three are measurable, and all three are invisible without job costing that reads against the estimate.
Structural steel contractors at $1M to $5M net 6.5 percent, rising to 9.5 percent by $25M to $50M; the CFOS target at $1M to $5M is 11.5 percent. The distance between the trade average and the CFOS target comes out of operations in this trade, never out of pricing. It lives in the three mechanisms below, each of which moves margin without appearing as a failure on any single job. Nothing fabricates until shop drawings clear the EOR, and most rejections trace to coordination gaps the fabricator controls. Every review cycle moves the mill order, the delivery, and the crane schedule, and the detailing phase is billed or it's donated.
THE MATH BEHIND THE MISSING CASH.
The Paper Gate
Nothing fabricates until shop drawings clear the EOR, and most rejections trace to coordination gaps the fabricator controls. Every review cycle moves the mill order, the delivery, and the crane schedule, and the detailing phase is billed or it's donated.
The Idle Crane
The most expensive spread on the project idles when foundations, inspections, or access aren't ready, and erection crews are rarely the cause. Crane cost coded by lift plus same-day standby documentation converts the GC's unreadiness into a claim instead of a loss.
The Ton Tape
Steel up 18 percent in a year on tariffs, fabrication benchmarked at $1,800 to $3,200 per ton, sold into fixed-price contracts. Without escalation clauses and dated price bases, the steel contractor is trading commodities with a crane. (cfos-job-profitability-system) ---
WHAT CHANGES IN THE FIRST 60 DAYS.
| Metric | $1M to $5M | $5M to $10M | $10M to $25M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin, industry average | 23% | 24% | 25% |
| Gross margin, CFOS target | 25.5% | 26.5% | 27.5% |
| Net profit, industry average | 8% | 10% | 12% |
| Net profit, CFOS target | 11.5% | 13.5% | 15.5% |
| Overhead, industry average | 15% | 14% | 13% |
| Overhead, CFOS target | 14% | 13% | 12% |
Industry figures are Structural Steel contractors' AVERAGE for each revenue band, not a floor. The CFOS net profit target is set at 10 percent before taxes or 3.5 points better than your trade's average at your revenue, whichever is higher, and the gross margin target is set at whatever gross margin produces that net profit once your overhead is paid, and never below your trade's own average. Gross minus overhead equals net on every column, so the rows tie out.
Gross margin and overhead come from figures CFMA, Jones Maresca and other sources publish by trade and size. Net profit is derived from them as gross margin minus overhead, so the three rows tie. That makes it an operating profit figure: what is left before interest, other income and expense, and the tax planning choices owners make, such as bonuses, depreciation methods and retirement contributions.
Surveys report net income before taxes after those items, so a reported net can run below the figure here. At the typical contractor the difference is small: CFMA's 2025 medians are 7.1 percent before interest and taxes and 6.7 percent net income before taxes. It grows with size. Against the separate measured net profit dataset, the calculated net runs 0.8 points higher at $1M to $5M, 2.2 points at $5M to $10M and 3.5 points at $10M to $25M, because the gross margin and overhead rows change faster with size than reported net profit does. The bands above the $10M to $25M band are published at runoncfos.com as a modeled extension of the same curves. They have not been reconciled against the licensed CFMA Benchmarker, and the calculated net there runs well above survey medians, so read them as a model and not as a survey result.
| Last 12 months revenue | Monthly fee | One-time onboarding |
|---|---|---|
| Up to $1M | $1,900 to $2,900 | $1,000 |
| $1M to $3.5M | $2,600 to $3,900 | $1,500 |
| $3.5M to $6.5M | $3,800 to $5,700 | $3,000 |
| $6.5M to $9.5M | $5,100 to $7,100 | $4,500 |
| $9.5M to $12.5M | $6,100 to $8,500 | $6,000 |
| $12.5M to $15.5M | $7,400 to $11,000 | $7,500 |
| $15.5M to $18.5M | $9,400 to $13,500 | $9,000 |
| $18.5M+ | Quoted individually | Quoted individually |
The onboarding fee covers migrating your books back to the start of your last taxable year and getting you fully operational in 60 days. It's billed once, with your first invoice. It's the same for all three tiers. Your first month is prorated, and your monthly engagement starts on the first of the first full month.
Range reflects the three tiers below. Which one you're in depends on how much of the work you want off your desk. No payroll. No hidden line items. The onboarding fee is right here in the table.
You stop guessing.
You get the CFO work. Job costing built against the way you estimate, a 13 week cash forecast, monthly WIP, and a meeting every month that ends in decisions and never in a report.
Your bookkeeper still does the books.
You stop touching the books.
Everything in Core, and we run the bookkeeping and the controllership as well. Your office stops answering coding questions and stops chasing a reconciliation on the last day of the month.
We do the books. No payroll.
Every job shows its margin while it's still running.
Everything in Executive, plus the job costing and WIP platform set up, loaded with your cost codes, and managed for you every month. You never have to learn it.
We do the books, the job costing, and the software. No payroll.
FREQUENTLY ASKED.
IN THEIR OWN WORDS.
As the owner of a union steel company, I know how fast cash flow and job costing can get away from you. About a month ago I brought on Josh and his team at SPM the Construction CFO, and we saw improvements right away.
Josh and Stewart are both great to work with. They're not only good at what they do — they truly care about helping you succeed and they deliver results. I've known Josh personally for a while, and he's the same person in business as he is outside of it: honest, straightforward, and a genuinely good guy.
If you're a contractor looking to get your finances in order, I'd recommend SPM without hesitation.
