JOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFOSUBCONTRACTOR FINANCEOVERHEAD RATEPAY APP BILLINGAR RECOVERYCONTROLQOREJOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFOSUBCONTRACTOR FINANCEOVERHEAD RATEPAY APP BILLINGAR RECOVERYCONTROLQOREJOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFOSUBCONTRACTOR FINANCEOVERHEAD RATEPAY APP BILLINGAR RECOVERYCONTROLQOREJOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFOSUBCONTRACTOR FINANCEOVERHEAD RATEPAY APP BILLINGAR RECOVERYCONTROLQORE
The Construction CFOSchedule a Free Call

TL;DR: Electrical contractors doing both service work and new construction have two different business lines with completely different cost structures, billing cycles, and margin profiles blended into one P&L. Service work should produce 35–55% gross margin when billed correctly — significantly higher than new construction. Without separating them in job costing, a profitable construction book masks a losing service book or the reverse. SPM builds parallel job costing streams in ControlQore so each side of the business is visible monthly with its own margin report.

Electrical Contractor — Job Costing

Service Work and New Construction
Are Two Different Businesses.

Your P&L blends them together. One might be making 40% gross margin. The other might be making 12%. You have no idea which is which. Here is how to separate them.

Published: May 2026Updated: May 2026
35–55%
Target GM for Electrical Service Work
18–28%
Typical GM for New Construction
Weekly
How Service Work Should Be Billed
$37.5K
Float Recovered Switching Monthly to Weekly T&M
The Problem

Why Blended P&L Hides the Truth

An electrical contractor doing $1.5M in new construction at 22% gross margin and $800,000 in service work at 15% gross margin has a blended gross margin of roughly 19%. That looks acceptable. But the service side is significantly underperforming — service work priced and billed correctly should produce 35–45% gross margin. Without separating them, the decision that service work is "close enough" is made on no data at all.

01

Different Cost Structures

New construction cost is dominated by direct labor and material on specific jobs. Service work cost is dominated by truck overhead, dispatch time, diagnostic labor, and callback rate. Lumping them into one P&L means neither is being costed correctly — the overhead allocation for a service truck is being averaged with new construction labor and producing a number that does not reflect the true cost of either.

02

Different Billing Cycles

New construction billing follows a pay app cycle — submit monthly, get paid 30–60 days later. Service billing should follow call completion — submit within 48 hours, get paid in 15–30 days. When service billing is lumped into monthly cycles, the cash timing advantage of service work disappears. Service work's primary financial advantage over new construction is faster cash. Monthly billing eliminates it.

03

Service Subsidizing Construction — or Vice Versa

Without separation, one business line is inevitably subsidizing the other and nobody knows it. The most common pattern: service work is underpriced relative to its overhead cost (truck, dispatch, small job overhead) and new construction covers the gap. Service work looks profitable because nobody has calculated the real per-call overhead. Once calculated, the pricing changes or the service book shrinks.

The Fix

Parallel Job Costing for Two Business Lines

1. Separate Service and Construction in ControlQore

SPM builds two job costing streams — service work and new construction — each with its own cost codes, billing cadence, and margin reporting. Service calls are individual jobs with call-level cost tracking. New construction jobs are phased with pay app billing tied to the WIP schedule. Monthly reporting shows both side by side with their own gross margin lines.

2. Bill Service Work Within 48 Hours of Call Completion

Every completed service call gets an invoice within 48 hours. Not at end of week. Not at end of month. Within 48 hours. On $800,000 per year in service work, the difference between weekly billing and monthly billing is roughly $37,500 in permanent float recovery — money that used to sit in unbilled work waiting for the month to close, now collected continuously.

3. Calculate Real Per-Call Overhead

Service overhead includes truck cost (payment, insurance, maintenance, fuel), dispatcher time or answering service cost, and a share of shop/yard overhead allocated to the service fleet. Divide annual service overhead by number of service calls. Add to direct labor and material to get true per-call cost. Compare to average invoice value. If per-call overhead plus labor and material exceeds the average invoice, service work is losing money on every call regardless of what the blended P&L shows.

4. Track Callback Rate Separately

Callback labor — time spent on warranty or redo work — is pure cost with no corresponding billing. SPM tracks it as a separate cost code so the quality metric is visible. Contractors who track callback rates reduce them over time by identifying which technicians, call types, or material suppliers are generating repeat calls. A 5% callback rate on $800,000 in service work is $40,000 in unbilled labor per year.

Client Outcome

What Separation Shows You

Anonymous Client — Electrical Contractor · $2.3M Revenue

This contractor did both service work and new construction for three active GC relationships. Blended gross margin was 19% — acceptable but not great. When SPM separated the two streams, new construction was running 28% gross margin across all three GC relationships. Service work was running 11% — below the breakeven point once per-call overhead was correctly allocated.

$365,000 in AR recovered

Across both service and construction billings — the single biggest immediate improvement was simply collecting what had already been billed but not followed up on.

Service repriced at 1.4x

Once the true per-call cost was visible, service labor rates were repriced to reflect actual overhead. Some customers moved on. The ones who stayed are now profitable. Total service revenue decreased. Service margin increased from 11% to 38%.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do electrical contractors need to separate service work from new construction in job costing?
Service work and new construction have completely different cost structures, billing cycles, and margin profiles. New construction is billed through pay apps on 30–60 day cycles with retainage. Service work is billed immediately after the call — or should be. Without separating them, a profitable new construction book can mask a losing service book, or vice versa. The blended P&L shows acceptable margin while one side of the business is quietly losing money.
What gross margin should electrical service work produce versus new construction?
Electrical service work, when priced correctly, should produce 35–55% gross margin — significantly higher than new construction because the overhead per call (truck, dispatch, technician time) is fixed regardless of the call value, labor productivity per dollar of billing is different, and there is no retainage. New construction typically runs 18–28% gross margin on well-managed projects. When service work shows margins below 25%, it is almost always a billing or overhead allocation problem.
How does T&M billing affect electrical contractor cash flow versus contract work?
T&M work billed weekly versus monthly is the difference between cash arriving in 7 days and cash arriving in 37 days. On service work with $50,000 per month in T&M billings, switching from monthly to weekly billing recovers approximately $37,500 in float permanently — money that was sitting in unbilled work waiting for the end of the month. SPM implements weekly T&M billing as a standard part of electrical service contractor onboarding.
What cost codes should an electrical service contractor use?
At minimum: labor by service technician and call type (diagnostic, repair, installation, inspection), material by call, vehicle and fuel by technician, dispatch overhead allocation, and callback/warranty labor tracked separately. Callback labor — time spent fixing work that should have been done right the first time — is a quality metric as much as a cost metric. Contractors who track it improve callback rates over time.
How does SPM set up job costing for electrical contractors with both service and new construction?
SPM builds two parallel job costing streams in ControlQore — one for service work (call-level costing by technician and call type) and one for new construction (job-level costing by phase and pay app). Monthly reporting shows margin by stream side by side so the profitability of each business line is visible separately. Most electrical contractors who go through this process find that one side is performing better than they thought and one side is performing worse.
Josh Luebker
Josh Luebker
Fractional CFO · The Construction CFO

Former commercial construction PM and master electrician. Managed 150+ projects totaling $300M+. Now fractional CFO for subcontractors doing $1M–$12M through Sulphur Prairie Management. About Josh →  |  LinkedIn →

Ready to Fix the Cash Problem?

A free call with Josh takes 30 minutes. Bring your last P&L and current bank balance.

Schedule a Free Call →
Related Resources
CFO Services
Best CFO for Electrical Subcontractors
Electrical-specific job costing including service/construction split
Pain Point
Electrical Sub Cash Gap
The 73-day new construction cash gap
Pain Point
Material Procurement Cash Flow
Switchgear deposits on the construction side
Job Costing
Don't Know If Jobs Are Profitable
The broader job costing problem
CFO Services
CFO for Electrical Contractors
Full service overview for electrical subs
Core ICP Problem
Profitable But No Cash
Why blended margin hides the real cash problem
The Construction CFO
Service vs New ConstructionBest CFO ElectricalElectrical Cash GapSchedule a CallJosh@ConstructionCFO.net
© 2026 SULPHUR PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT · SULPHUR ROCK, AR
0