Skip to main content
JOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFOSUBCONTRACTOR FINANCEOVERHEAD RATEPAY APP BILLINGAR RECOVERYCONTROLQORECFOSJOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFOSUBCONTRACTOR FINANCEOVERHEAD RATEPAY APP BILLINGAR RECOVERYCONTROLQORECFOSJOB COSTINGCASH FLOWWIP REPORTINGFRACTIONAL CFO
THE CONSTRUCTION CFO BOOK A FREE CALL

OVERHEAD RATE BENCHMARKS FOR MARINE CONTRACTORS

QUICK ANSWER

Marine subcontractors typically run 28–42% overhead on direct labor (with equipment costed separately by production hour) or 12–18% overhead on direct cost (with equipment absorbed in the rate). The wide range reflects significant differences in equipment intensity, geographic concentration, and project mix between marine subs. Equipment-heavy marine subs (heavy pile driving, dredging, deep-foundation work) run at the higher end. Labor-heavy marine subs (light marine construction, fender systems, dock building) run at the lower end. The rate matters less than whether it’s calibrated to actual overhead reality and recalibrated quarterly.

The marine overhead rate isn’t one number. It’s a function of equipment intensity, geographic concentration, and the customer mix the business actually works.

PUBLISHED JUNE 12, 2026 BY JOSH LUEBKER UPDATED JUNE 12, 2026
THE BENCHMARK

MARINE OVERHEAD RATE RANGES

Marine subcontractor overhead rates vary more by allocation method and equipment intensity than by revenue band. The following ranges are benchmarks SPM sees across active marine engagements:

  • On direct labor (equipment costed separately): 28–42%. Most properly-structured marine subs land in this range with equipment-by-production-hour costing pulling significant cost out of general overhead.
  • On direct cost (equipment absorbed in overhead): 12–18%. The lower percentage reflects equipment cost flowing through the absorption rate rather than being separately allocated.
  • On production hours (equipment-hour basis): $45–$95 per production hour for general overhead, plus equipment-specific hourly rates for major equipment ($85–$340 per equipment hour depending on equipment class).

The right basis for a specific marine sub depends on the work mix. Pile driving and deep-foundation subs typically use equipment-hour basis because equipment time dominates the cost structure. Dock-building and fender-system subs typically use direct-labor basis because labor dominates. Mixed-scope subs often use direct-labor with equipment carved out separately.

WHAT DRIVES THE SPREAD

WHY MARINE RATES VARY SO MUCH

DRIVER 1

EQUIPMENT INTENSITY

Marine equipment fleets range from $500K (light marine construction) to $8M+ (heavy pile driving, dredging). Equipment-heavy subs have substantially more fixed cost to absorb — depreciation, financing, insurance, mooring, transportation. Their overhead rates run 8–15 percentage points higher than equipment-light marine subs at the same revenue scale.

DRIVER 2

GEOGRAPHIC FOOTPRINT

Marine subs operating across multiple states or coasts carry higher overhead than geographically concentrated subs. Travel, lodging, equipment transportation, multi-state licensing and insurance, and management oversight all increase with footprint. A regional marine sub typically runs 4–8 points lower overhead than a national-footprint marine sub at the same revenue.

DRIVER 3

PUBLIC SECTOR VS. PRIVATE COMMERCIAL MIX

Public sector work (USACE, port authorities, state DOTs) carries higher compliance overhead (DBE/HUB reporting, prevailing wage tracking, Buy American compliance, certified payroll, EEO reporting) than private commercial work. Heavy public sector subs typically run 3–6 points higher overhead than commercial-heavy marine subs at the same revenue.

DRIVER 4

BONDING AND INSURANCE PROGRAMS

Marine work requires higher bonding and insurance limits than most construction trades. P&I coverage, MEL coverage, USL&H coverage, jones act exposure — marine insurance programs typically run 2–3x the cost of equivalent land-based programs. The carrying cost of bonding capacity for major projects also runs higher. Both flow through overhead.

DRIVER 5

SHOP AND FABRICATION INFRASTRUCTURE

Marine subs with in-house fabrication shops (steel pile fabrication, wood timber crib construction, specialty rigging) carry shop infrastructure as overhead unless allocated to specific projects. Shop-equipped marine subs typically run 4–9 points higher overhead than field-only marine subs, though the shop capacity often translates to margin advantage on specialty work.

COMMON MISCALCULATIONS

WHERE MARINE OVERHEAD RATES GO WRONG

  • Equipment cost double-counted. Some marine subs allocate equipment by production hour AND include equipment-related overhead in the general overhead rate, double-counting equipment cost in bid math.
  • Mobilization cost absorbed in overhead. Mobilization is a project-specific cost that should appear in the SOV, not absorbed into general overhead. Marine subs that absorb mobilization in overhead artificially inflate their overhead rate and underprice mobilization on bids.
  • Permitting cost in overhead. USCG/ACOE permitting cost is typically project-specific and reimbursable. Subs that absorb it in overhead miss billing opportunities.
  • Crew burden mixed into overhead. Crew burden (workers comp, payroll taxes, training, certifications, USL&H) belongs in direct labor cost, not overhead. Marine subs mixing the categories distort which work is actually profitable.
  • Stale rate calculation. Marine equipment financing, insurance premiums, and compliance costs change continuously. Annual rate calculations drift 3–7 points off reality over the course of the year. Quarterly recalibration is the structural standard.
THE METHODOLOGY

HOW THE RATE SHOULD BE CALCULATED

For marine subs, the recommended calculation methodology:

Step 1: Pull trailing 12-month actual overhead from the financials. Include G&A, vehicle expense (non-production), office occupancy, insurance (general business, not marine project-specific), professional fees, software, training, management compensation. Exclude equipment-specific cost (handled separately) and project-specific cost like mobilization and permitting.

Step 2: Calculate equipment hourly rates separately for major equipment ($30K+ replacement cost). Include depreciation, financing, insurance, maintenance, fuel where applicable. Generate hourly rates per equipment class.

Step 3: Apply general overhead to direct labor as the absorption basis. Direct labor includes wages, burden, USL&H, certifications.

Step 4: Validate the rate against trailing volume. Total overhead recovered through the rate should approximate total overhead spent. Adjust if material gap exists.

Step 5: Recalibrate quarterly. Marine cost categories move continuously; annual recalculation drifts too far off reality.

The right overhead rate for your marine business isn’t an industry average. It’s the calibrated rate that recovers your overhead reality, recalculated quarterly, applied correctly into every bid.

FREQUENTLY ASKED

Marine rates typically run 5–12 percentage points higher than civil at the same revenue scale, primarily because of marine insurance (USL&H, P&I, MEL), more expensive equipment per crew, and higher compliance overhead on public sector work. A $5M civil sub might run 22% on direct labor; a comparable marine sub typically runs 28–34%. The driver is the structural cost of operating in marine environments, not inefficiency.
Most well-structured marine subs use direct-labor basis with equipment carved out separately by production hour. Direct-cost basis is simpler but obscures the equipment cost driver and produces less accurate bid math on projects with very different equipment-to-labor ratios. Subs that move from direct-cost basis to direct-labor with equipment-hour costing typically see meaningful improvement in bid accuracy within the first 6 months.
USL&H (longshore and harbor workers) compensation insurance applies to marine work performed on navigable waters. The premium rate is significantly higher than standard workers comp — typically 8–18% of payroll vs. 3–7% for general construction. USL&H belongs in direct labor burden (not general overhead) because it scales with crew hours. Subs that put it in overhead distort both the overhead rate and the direct labor cost.
Jones Act applies to crew members working on vessels in navigable waters. The exposure profile is different from USL&H and the insurance coverage runs significantly more expensive. Subs with regular vessel-crew exposure need Jones Act-specific coverage and should bid that exposure separately rather than absorbing it generically into overhead. The right approach is project-specific cost coding for jones act exposure.
Quarterly minimum, monthly preferred for active marine subs. Marine cost categories move continuously — fuel prices, equipment financing, insurance premium adjustments, USL&H rate changes, mooring fee adjustments. Annual recalculation drifts 3–7 points off reality over the course of the year, always in the direction of underabsorption. Quarterly catches drift before it shows up as margin compression on bids.
Josh Luebker, The Construction CFO
JOSH LUEBKER
THE CONSTRUCTION CFO · SULPHUR PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT

PM and master electrician turned CFO. Managed 150+ projects, $300M+ in volume — Google data centers, military bases, hospitals — before building the financial control system that saves subcontractors from running out of cash. SPM runs the financial function for $1M–$12M commercial subs across 24 trade specializations. Read the methodology at runoncfos.com.

RELATED SYSTEM PAGES
TRADE OS
Marine Operating System
The full CFOS architecture for marine subcontractors
SERVICE
CFO for Marine Contractors
The trade-specific CFO engagement for commercial marine subs
TOOL
Overhead Rate Calculator
The construction overhead rate calculator

YOUR MARINE OVERHEAD RATE IS PROBABLY UNDERSIZED.

30 minutes. We’ll calculate your honest marine overhead rate and show you what your bids should reflect.

BOOK A FREE CALL OR RUN YOUR FREE CEO REPORT FIRST
SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
CFOS SPINE + MODULES
Run on CFOS — Full System Index Trade Benchmarking System Cash Control System Job Profitability System
RELATED SYSTEMS
Marine OS CFO for Marine Contractors Overhead Rate Calculator
SERVICE LAYER
Fractional CFO for Construction Construction Bookkeeping Construction Controllership
THE CONSTRUCTION CFO
Run on CFOS Fractional CFO Cash Control Book a Call CONTROL Book → Josh@ConstructionCFO.net
© 2026 SULPHUR PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT · SULPHUR ROCK, AR
0
Josh Luebker, The Construction CFO
JOSH LUEBKER
FOUNDER & CFO

Master electrician and former project manager, 150+ projects and $2.1B+ in commercial work. Now runs the numbers for subcontractors instead of standing on the job site.

LinkedIn About
Stewart Bohrer, The Construction CFO
STEWART BOHRER
VP OF OPERATIONS

Keeps the system running day to day: job costing, WIP, monthly financial reviews, and the follow-through between calls. Josh handles onboarding.

LinkedIn About
LinkedIn YouTube About Run on CFOS