CONSTRUCTION JOB COSTING SETUP, DONE RIGHT.
Job costing setup starts with cost codes structured to match your actual estimate format, not a generic chart of accounts. From there, WIP calculation logic, overhead allocation, and weekly cost-to-complete tracking all get built on top of that structure. Setup done this way lets actual job cost be compared directly to the bid, line by line, instead of approximated after the fact.
The order of operations is the whole job. Cost codes come first because every report built later reads off them, so a structure that doesn't mirror the estimate produces reports that compare your cost to the wrong reference point forever. Overhead allocation comes second, because a flat percentage applied evenly across every job is a guess dressed up as arithmetic. WIP logic comes third and has to match how you bill rather than how a software template assumes you bill. Get that sequence backwards and the system produces numbers nobody in the field believes.
WHAT IT MEANS.
Job costing setup is translation work: taking the structure your estimators already use to bid work and building the accounting system to track cost in that identical structure, so actual cost and bid cost can be compared line by line rather than approximated at a category level.
Most setups fail for the same reason: somebody imported a template. A generic chart of accounts is built for a business that sells one thing at one margin, and a subcontractor sells forty jobs at forty margins with a different cost mix on each one. The structure has to be built from your estimates outward, which means the estimating team has to be in the room for it.
WHERE IT GOES WRONG.
We will use a template and adjust later
The belief is that a standard chart of accounts gets the system running and the structure can be corrected once the business knows what it wants. Adjusting a mismatched cost code structure after the fact means rebuilding every historical job cost report to the corrected structure, one job at a time. The alternative is living with reports that never reconcile to the estimates they're supposed to be measured against.
Overhead is close enough at a flat percentage
A flat percentage applied to every job is the fastest way to set overhead up and the least useful. It systematically overstates the profitability of low-overhead jobs and understates the high-overhead ones, so the two kinds of work look more alike than they are. That distorts the one decision job costing exists to inform, which is what kind of work to go after next.
We will figure out the WIP calculation later
WIP logic has to match the business's real billing structure from the day the system goes live. Configured generically and corrected later, every WIP report between those two dates is potentially wrong, including the ones the bank and the surety already read. There's no way to unsend a WIP schedule, so the logic has to be right before the first one goes out.
WHAT COUNTS MOST.
The first step is structuring cost codes to mirror the company's own estimate format rather than a generic chart of accounts or an industry template. That confirmation happens with the estimating team, not around them, because they're the only people who know how the bid is broken out. Once the two structures line up, actual cost can be compared line by line to the bid instead of category by category.
Overhead gets allocated based on real activity or a specific driver relevant to the business, equipment hours or admin time for example, rather than one percentage spread evenly across every job. Picking the driver is the work, and it's different for an equipment-heavy civil contractor than for a labor-heavy concrete crew. Once the driver is right, a job that consumes more of the office and the yard carries more of the cost of both.
The WIP calculation gets configured against your real revenue recognition method and your real billing structure, then validated against one finished job before anything is reported off it. Validation is the step most setups skip, and it's the cheapest insurance in the whole project. A structure that produces the right answer on a job you already know the answer to is a structure you can trust on the jobs you don't.
THE OUTPUTS, NAMED.
FLAT MONTHLY FEE. NO SURPRISES.
Three tiers, priced by your trailing twelve month revenue. Which one you're in depends on how much of the work you want off your desk. No hourly billing, no payroll, and no add-ons.
| Last 12 months revenue | Monthly fee |
|---|---|
| Up to $1M | $1,900 to $2,900 |
| $1M to $3.5M | $2,600 to $3,900 |
| $3.5M to $6.5M | $3,800 to $5,700 |
| $6.5M to $9.5M | $5,100 to $7,100 |
| $9.5M to $12.5M | $6,100 to $8,500 |
| $12.5M to $15.5M | $7,400 to $11,000 |
| $15.5M to $18.5M | $9,400 to $13,500 |
| $18.5M+ | Quoted individually |
Range reflects the three tiers below. Which one you're in depends on how much of the work you want off your desk. No payroll. No hidden line items.
You stop guessing.
You get the CFO work. Job costing built against the way you estimate, a 13 week cash forecast, monthly WIP, and a meeting every month that ends in decisions rather than a report.
Your bookkeeper keeps doing the books.
You stop touching the books.
Everything in Core, and we run the bookkeeping and the controllership as well. Nobody in your office is answering coding questions or chasing a reconciliation at month end.
We do the books. No payroll.
Every job shows its margin while it's still running.
Everything in Executive, plus the job costing and WIP platform set up, loaded with your cost codes, and managed for you every month. You never have to learn it.
We do the job costing.
FREQUENTLY ASKED.
