Winning Too Many Bids
Is Costing You Money.
Most contractors worry about not winning enough work. If you're winning more than 35% of your competitive bids, you have the opposite problem — and it's more expensive than losing bids. Here's what's actually happening and how to fix it today.
Why a High Win Rate Is a Warning Sign
The Overhead Rate Was Set Once and Never Updated
You set your overhead rate when you started bidding. Since then you hired a PM, bought equipment, added insurance, and moved into a larger shop. The overhead grew. The rate in bids didn't. Every bid since that last hire is underpriced by the difference — silently, on every single job.
Owner Compensation Is Missing or Understated
The single most common overhead understatement: the owner books a nominal salary of $60,000–$80,000 to minimize payroll taxes and takes draws when cash allows. The overhead rate is calculated on $70,000. The real value of the owner's role at $5M in revenue is $140,000–$170,000. The bid model is underfunded by $70,000–$100,000 per year on every bid.
Equipment Depreciation Is Not in Overhead
Equipment depreciates whether it's working or sitting. An excavator with $4,200/month in ownership cost needs to be covered by the overhead rate — or by job-level equipment cost codes. If it's booked to a balance sheet account and never hits the P&L, the overhead rate is understated by exactly that amount. Every bid misses it.
How to Correct Your Overhead Rate Right Now
What a 3-Point Overhead Gap Costs Over Time
| Revenue | 3pt Overhead Gap | Annual Cost | 5-Year Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2M | 3% | $60,000/yr | $300,000 |
| $3M | 3% | $90,000/yr | $450,000 |
| $5M | 3% | $150,000/yr | $750,000 |
| $8M | 3% | $240,000/yr | $1,200,000 |
| $10M | 3% | $300,000/yr | $1,500,000 |
A 3-point overhead gap is conservative. SPM finds 5–8 point gaps at engagement start on most clients whose overhead rate hasn't been recalculated in 2+ years.