CIVIL & EARTHWORK CLUSTER · CFOS TRADE OPERATING SYSTEM

WHY GRADING CONTRACTORS LOSE MARGIN WITHOUT KNOWING IT.

QUICK ANSWER

Grading margin is lost to three specific things: the two economies, the acceptance gate, and the idle spread. Grading subcontractors at $1M to $5M run 18 percent gross and 5.5 percent net, against CFOS targets at $1M to $5M of 25 percent gross and 10 percent net. All three are measurable, and all three are invisible without job costing that reads against the estimate.

Grading contractors at $1M to $5M net 5.5 percent, rising to 8 percent by $25M to $50M; the CFOS target at $1M to $5M is 10 percent. The distance between the trade average and the CFOS target comes out of operations in this trade, never out of pricing. It lives in the three mechanisms below, each of which moves margin without appearing as a failure on any single job. Mass grading sells yards; fine grading sells tolerance. One blended cost history misprices both, and the trade's 18 percent gross margin has no room for systematically wrong bids in either direction.

BY JOSH LUEBKERPublished 2026-08-06Updated 2026-08-06
THE THREE BIG LEAKS

THE MATH BEHIND THE MISSING CASH.

LEAK 01

The Two Economies

Mass grading sells yards; fine grading sells tolerance. One blended cost history misprices both, and the trade's 18 percent gross margin has no room for systematically wrong bids in either direction.

LEAK 02

The Acceptance Gate

Density tests and subgrade acceptance are payment gates: a failed proctor is unpaid production plus retest fees plus schedule burn. Moisture and soils documentation is what separates a claim from a donation.

LEAK 03

The Idle Spread

Sixteen percent overhead at the small end, heaviest in the dirt family, running twelve months against seasonal production. Winter reserves and utilization tracking are the difference between a spring restart and a spring refinance. (cfos-working-capital-system) ---

HOW CFOS FIXES IT

WHAT CHANGES IN THE FIRST 60 DAYS.

Mass vs fine grading (two production economies, one bid book)
GPS machine control (the box that changed the math)
Compaction failure and subgrade rejection (the redo trades)
DOT and public payment regimes
Fuel, rock, and operator overtime (the variance trio)
GRADING BENCHMARKS
Metric$1M to $5M$5M to $10M$10M to $25M
Gross margin, industry average18%20%22%
Gross margin, CFOS target25%24%24.5%
Net profit, industry average2%5%8%
Net profit, CFOS target10%10%11.5%
Overhead, industry average16%15%14%
Overhead, CFOS target15%14%13%

Industry figures are Grading contractors' AVERAGE for each revenue band, not a floor. The CFOS net profit target is set at 10 percent before taxes or 3.5 points better than your trade's average at your revenue, whichever is higher, and the gross margin target is set at whatever gross margin produces that net profit once your overhead is paid, and never below your trade's own average. Gross minus overhead equals net on every column, so the rows tie out.

HOW THE NET PROFIT FIGURES ARE BUILT

Gross margin and overhead come from figures CFMA, Jones Maresca and other sources publish by trade and size. Net profit is derived from them as gross margin minus overhead, so the three rows tie. That makes it an operating profit figure: what is left before interest, other income and expense, and the tax planning choices owners make, such as bonuses, depreciation methods and retirement contributions.

Surveys report net income before taxes after those items, so a reported net can run below the figure here. At the typical contractor the difference is small: CFMA's 2025 medians are 7.1 percent before interest and taxes and 6.7 percent net income before taxes. It grows with size. Against the separate measured net profit dataset, the calculated net runs 0.8 points higher at $1M to $5M, 2.2 points at $5M to $10M and 3.5 points at $10M to $25M, because the gross margin and overhead rows change faster with size than reported net profit does. The bands above the $10M to $25M band are published at runoncfos.com as a modeled extension of the same curves. They have not been reconciled against the licensed CFMA Benchmarker, and the calculated net there runs well above survey medians, so read them as a model and not as a survey result.

Last 12 months revenueMonthly feeOne-time onboarding
Up to $1M$1,900 to $2,900$1,000
$1M to $3.5M$2,600 to $3,900$1,500
$3.5M to $6.5M$3,800 to $5,700$3,000
$6.5M to $9.5M$5,100 to $7,100$4,500
$9.5M to $12.5M$6,100 to $8,500$6,000
$12.5M to $15.5M$7,400 to $11,000$7,500
$15.5M to $18.5M$9,400 to $13,500$9,000
$18.5M+Quoted individuallyQuoted individually

The onboarding fee covers migrating your books back to the start of your last taxable year and getting you fully operational in 60 days. It's billed once, with your first invoice. It's the same for all three tiers. Your first month is prorated, and your monthly engagement starts on the first of the first full month.

Range reflects the three tiers below. Which one you're in depends on how much of the work you want off your desk. No payroll. No hidden line items. The onboarding fee is right here in the table.

Core

You stop guessing.

You get the CFO work. Job costing built against the way you estimate, a 13 week cash forecast, monthly WIP, and a meeting every month that ends in decisions and never in a report.

Your bookkeeper still does the books.

Executive

You stop touching the books.

Everything in Core, and we run the bookkeeping and the controllership as well. Your office stops answering coding questions and stops chasing a reconciliation on the last day of the month.

We do the books. No payroll.

Strategic

Every job shows its margin while it's still running.

Everything in Executive, plus the job costing and WIP platform set up, loaded with your cost codes, and managed for you every month. You never have to learn it.

We do the books, the job costing, and the software. No payroll.

What's included
COMMON QUESTIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED.

Grading contractors at $1M to $5M net 5.5 percent on average, rising to 8 percent by $25M to $50M; the CFOS target at $1M to $5M is 10 percent. The trade's gap concentrates in blended mass/fine pricing, unclaimed rework at the acceptance gate, and a heavy spread funded through the off-season. Every net profit figure here is stated before taxes, the same basis CFMA reports on, so the two are directly comparable.
No. Mass grading sells cubic yards per hour; fine grading sells tolerance held per acre. Track production, machines, and operators separately by grading type; a blended average overprices the bulk work and underprices the precision work at the same time.
The contract and the paper decide. If the moisture, lift thickness, and soils matched spec and the material still failed, documentation supports a changed-condition claim; if the record is thin, the grader re-rips, re-compacts, and re-tests for free. Code rework separately and document conditions on every lift.
It trades stakes and rework for hardware, subscriptions, and model-prep labor, and those costs have to land somewhere: either allocated into machine hourly rates or held in overhead on purpose. It also concentrates risk in the surface model; a bad model runs wrong grade at production speed.
On measured quantities against agency estimates, on public payment cycles, with retainage and final acceptance running past private norms. Bid the cash cost of the agency's calendar, and track quantities to the agency's measurement method from day one.
A bookkeeper records history. Split production histories, acceptance-gate documentation, machine-control cost allocation, and winter reserves are a control system, which is CFO work. SPM operates that financial control function for grading contractors. ---
CFOS serves commercial grading subcontractors doing $1M to $12M. Pricing starts at $1,900 per month for companies under $1M and runs to $13,500 per month at the top published band. Onboarding takes 60 days.
Three tiers, and which one you are in depends on how much of the work you want off your desk. Core is where you stop guessing: job costing built against the way you estimate, a 13 week cash forecast, monthly WIP, and a monthly meeting that ends in decisions, while your bookkeeper keeps doing the books. Executive is where you stop touching the books, because we run the bookkeeping and the controllership as well. Strategic is where every job shows its margin while it is still running, because the job costing and WIP platform is set up and managed for you. No payroll. No scope gaps.
Sixty days. We migrate your books back to the start of your last taxable year, set up ControlQore, and build your job costing structure from scratch. Fully operational in two months.
$10.7M+
Client AR Recovered Since 2023
48
Active Trade Specializations
60 DAYS
Average Onboarding Time
WHAT THIS TIES INTO
Josh Luebker, SPM The Construction CFO
Josh Luebker
FRACTIONAL CFO · SPM THE CONSTRUCTION CFO

Josh Luebker is a master electrician turned construction CFO, president of SPM The Construction CFO and author of CONTROL: The Construction Financial Operating System.

DO YOU KNOW YOUR TRUE MARGIN ON GRADING WORK?

Twenty minutes of questions about how you price grading work, what your production split and equipment really cost you, and what your last closed job came in at. Nothing gets sold and nothing gets proposed. If Josh can help, you'll set a longer call.

You don't hire a CFO because it's safe, you do it because the real risk isn't having one.
Book a 20 minute call

20 minutes. Nothing gets sold on this call and nothing gets proposed. Josh asks questions to work out whether he can help at all.

OR START WITH THE WORKBOOKS. NO CALL NEEDED.