SAME REVENUE, SAME CREWS. $3.2M MORE IN BUSINESS VALUE.
He wasn't in trouble. He wanted to sell, and the number he was offered had nothing to do with how well his crews ran the work.
A $13.1M marine contractor increased his business value by $3.2M in nine months without adding revenue, because a buyer pays for provable, sustained profit rather than for volume. He started at roughly 7 percent net profit, which is $917,000 on $13.1M, and at a 2.5x EBITDA multiple that reflected disorganized books, the business was worth about $2.3M. Building job costing made unscrutinized spending visible and the tightening produced 7 percent in recovered margin, worth $917,000 a year on that revenue. Nine months later net profit runs at 14 percent, or $1,834,000 on the same revenue, and at a 3x multiple that reflects clean and documented profitability, the valuation is $5.5M. The nine months went into training four accounting staff and five operations and estimating people on a new system and producing twice monthly job level reporting that holds up in due diligence. A buyer looking at three months of clean financials is cautiously interested, and a buyer looking at eighteen consistent months writes a check.
The thing worth sitting with here is that the profit was already inside the business. Nobody sold more work, nobody raised a price on a GC, and nearly a million dollars a year was reaching the bottom line that had been leaking out of it in small decisions nobody could see.
This post is the story as the owner lived it, month by month. Read The Marine Contractor Valuation Case Study for the complete treatment, worked figures included.
A BUSINESS THAT WAS FINE AND WORTH LESS THAN HE THOUGHT.
The owner of a $13.1M marine contracting company wasn't in trouble. His business was solid, his crews were experienced, and his GC relationships were strong. Work kept coming in and jobs kept getting done.
But he had a goal most contractors never think about until it's too late. He wanted to sell, and when he started looking at what the business was worth, the number wasn't what he expected.
The problem wasn't revenue. It was that four accounting staff and five operations and estimating people were all working hard, all staying busy, and nobody had a clear picture of what the business was producing job by job. No job costing. No per project reporting. Just a busy back office generating financial statements that didn't tell the full story.
A buyer doesn't pay for revenue. A buyer pays for provable, sustainable profit, and provable, sustainable profit requires clean financials over time rather than one good year.
THE FRIVOLOUS SPEND NOBODY WAS WATCHING.
When we came in and built the job costing structure, the first thing that became visible was spending that had never been scrutinized because nobody had the system to scrutinize it.
Not fraud, and not negligence. Just the natural accumulation of expenses that happen in a busy company where everyone is focused on the work and nobody is focused on the cost of running the business. Subscriptions that had outlived their usefulness. Vendor relationships that hadn't been renegotiated in years. Material purchases that could have been tightened with better planning. Small decisions made in isolation that added up to a significant number when viewed together.
The tightening produced 7% in recovered margin. On $13.1M in revenue that's $917,000 a year, nearly a million dollars that was already inside the business and just not making it to the bottom line.
THE VALUATION MATH THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING.
Here's why clean financials carry so much weight for a contractor who wants to sell. Construction businesses are typically valued at a multiple of EBITDA, which is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. A marine contractor with a strong backlog, experienced crews, and stable GC relationships might command a 2.5 to 3x multiple depending on how clean the financials are and how long the profitability has been sustained.
When we started, the business was generating approximately 7% net profit on $13.1M in revenue. That's $917,000 in net profit. At a 2.5x multiple, reflecting the uncertainty a buyer sees in disorganized books, that's a valuation of roughly $2.3M.
After nine months of tightening spend, implementing job costing, and producing clean twice monthly reports for every job and for the business overall, net profit is now running at 14%, which is $1,834,000 on the same revenue. At a 3x multiple, reflecting the confidence a buyer has in clean, sustained, documented profitability, that's a valuation of $5.5M.
Same revenue. Same crews. Same GC relationships. $3.2M more in business value.
WHY THIS TOOK NINE MONTHS AND NOT NINETY DAYS.
Most of the client stories we tell involve a fast first 30 days: collections recovered, debt restructured, cash flow stabilized. This one is different. The marine contractor had four accounting staff and five operations and estimating people, and getting nine people trained on a new financial system, aligned on new reporting processes, and consistently producing the data that feeds clean job cost reports takes time. There's no shortcut when the team is that size and the habits are that established.
The nine months weren't slow. They were thorough. Every job now has a clean cost report, every two weeks the owner gets a report showing job level performance and overall business health, the data is consistent, the trend is clear, and the profitability is documented.
That documentation is what a buyer's due diligence process will scrutinize, and the longer it runs cleanly the stronger the valuation case becomes. A buyer seeing three months of clean financials is cautiously interested. A buyer seeing eighteen months of consistent, documented profitability is writing a check.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BUSY AND PROFITABLE.
Marine contracting attracts experienced operators. The work is technically demanding, the equipment is expensive, and the project management complexity is real, and most marine contractors are exceptionally good at the work.
What gets missed is the difference between a busy company and a profitable one. A company doing $13.1M in revenue with 7% net margin is producing $917,000. The same company with 14% net margin is producing $1,834,000. The crews are the same and the jobs are similar. The difference is financial discipline: knowing where every dollar goes, which jobs produce margin and which ones consume it, and where spending can be tightened without affecting the quality of the work.
Most marine contractors never build that discipline because they don't have the financial system to support it. They're too busy running jobs to look at the numbers closely enough, and when they finally do look, usually when they're thinking about selling or when something has gone wrong, they discover that years of good work produced less wealth than it should have.
WHAT THE BUSINESS LOOKS LIKE NOW.
The owner has a clear, documented path to a sale. Clean financials, consistent profitability, and job level reporting that shows any buyer where the money comes from and where it goes.
The business went from a $2.3M valuation to a $5.5M valuation in nine months without changing the revenue, the crews, or the work. The only thing that changed was the financial system underneath it. He knows what his business is worth now, and he knows what he needs to sustain to maximize that number when the time comes to sell.
THE SHORT LIST.
FREQUENTLY ASKED.
